Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.
How Kilo Code (Context Condensing) ranks
- 1.
Kilo Code (Context Condensing)79
- 2.
Codag72
- 3.
Not Diamond62
- 4.
LLMLingua (Microsoft)55
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Anaconda acquisition banner — Brightest element on the page with its own button, hijacking the scan path before the value prop.
- Get Started button — Same yellow weight as "Code for Free" below, splitting primary-CTA attention across two buttons.
- Five-item dropdown nav — Product, Models, Enterprise, Resources, Pricing plus GitHub star offer six exits before the CTA.
- Open VSX link — Underlined yellow link directly under the CTA pulls clicks away from the primary action.
Value props
76FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
One open agent for every developer workflow
500+ models, zero markup: frontier, open weight, or your own keys. One agent, everywhere you work, fully open source.
Working
- "500+ models, zero markup" is concrete
- Installer tabs prove "everywhere Kilo Code (Context Condensing) work"
- "Fully open source" hits dev trust
Could improve
- No outcome — what does the agent DO for devs?
- Zero emotional pull; copy is architectural
- "Every developer workflow" is broad
Trust
78FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

How Kilo Code (Context Condensing) compares
Trust read
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
CTA
86StrongCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Kilo Code (Context Condensing) compares
Recommended rewrites
