Intruderhttps://intruder.io/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

How Intruder ranks

  1. 1.Intruder75
  2. 2.Trident75
  3. 3.XBOW72
  4. 4.Terra Security68
  5. 5.Escape64
Fix Mobile web
75Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Mobile web68Trust72
category scoresShowHide
Mobile web68Trust72

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Six-line subheadline paragraph — Body copy scaled too large wraps to six lines and pushes the primary CTA to the fold's bottom edge.
  2. Side-by-side CTA row — TRY FOR FREE and BOOK A DEMO split one row into two desktop-proportioned buttons instead of a full-bleed primary.
  3. Stacked rating badges — Two full-width rating rows consume the top of the hero before the headline, adding vertical cost ahead of the value statement.

Trust

72Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
IntruderG2 "4.8 out of 5" and Gartner "4.7 out of 5" star-rating badges above the headline
Trident"Backed by Y" (Y Combinator) badge above the headline
XBOW"150+ security teams trust XBOW to find and prove the flaws attackers would actually exploit"
Terra SecurityProduct dashboard UI showing "Signals Received 148" and "5 Critical Findings"
Escape"Trusted by 2000+ security teams worldwide" with Applied and Miro logos

Value props

74Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Intruder’s headlineAlways-on exposure managementA single platform for AI pentesting, attack surface monitoring, cloud security and vulnerability management. Built for stretched security, IT and compliance teams.

Working

Could improve

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Intruder desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

84Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Intruder

How Intruder compares

Recommended rewrites