Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Hyperspell ranks
- 1.
Composio78
- 2.
Nango77
- 3.
Merge73
- 4.
Hyperspell70
- 5.
Paragon62
- 6.
Ragie43
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
58FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Hyperspell | Customer logo strip below the hero (Entelligence AI, Micro, smallest.ai, Hobbes) |
| Customer logo strip: HubSpot, wabi, agent.ai, Zoom | |
| Integration diagram showing a 'POST /actions' code payload (SALESFORCE_SEARCH_RECORDS) connecting real third-party app i | |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| Customer logo wall including ServiceNow, Zomato, Smartsheet, Contentful, Replit, Pinecone, The Linux Foundation, and Ram | |
| "Trusted by the companies building what's next" logo bar with OpenAI, Telnyx, Dropbox, Perplexity, Zoom, and Factory |
Value props
64FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
A brain for your company.
Hyperspell connects your tools, builds a context graph, and surfaces it as a filesystem any agent can read.
Working
- Subhead names concrete mechanism
- Customer logo bar adds proof
- Memorable, ownable metaphor
Could improve
- Headline could caption any AI tool
- No numbers or named outcomes
- Hero gradient decorates, not demos
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Hyperspell compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
84StrongDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
