Nangohttps://nango.dev/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.

How Nango ranks

  1. 1.Composio78
  2. 2.Nango77
  3. 3.Arcade75
  4. 4.Pomerium63
  5. 5.Paragon (AgentConnect)62
  6. 6.Agentic Fabriq59
Fix Information hierarchy
77Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Information hierarchy72Value props76
category scoresShowHide
Information hierarchy72Value props76

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Nav link row — Seven nav items plus GitHub star, Log In, and Sign Up create ~10 equal-weight exits before the hero CTA.
  2. Sign Up button — High-contrast black button in the header outweighs the hero's blue START BUILDING, splitting the primary action.
  3. START BUILDING button — Small footprint and light-blue fill on a light background read weaker than the black header button competing above it.
  4. Code panel model icons — 'Generate with' icon row plus '+ more' adds four extra outbound-feeling targets inside the hero scan path.

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Nango’s headline sellsIntegrations for your products & agentsConnect your product & agents to 1,000+ APIs, on infrastructure built for scale.

Working

  • 1,000+ APIs is concrete and credible
  • Code sample shows the product working
  • 12.3k stars + logo wall add proof

Could improve

  • No emotional hook for integration pain
  • 'Built for scale' is generic filler
  • No time-to-ship outcome stated

Trust

76Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Nango desktop capture for Trust

How Nango compares

Trust read

CTA

80Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Nango

How Nango compares

Recommended rewrites

Mobile web

80Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Nango mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve