Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Granola ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Granola | Realistic product demo: "Q3 GTM sync" notes window with meeting metadata and live video-call thumbnails |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| G2 badge "Rated 4.8 / 5" with "GDPR, SOC2, More" compliance markers | |
| Testimonial: "Otter is a must-have. Just being conservative - our team is getting 33% time back." — Laura Brown, Vice Pr | |
| SOC 2 Type II | GDPR | HIPAA Compliant | SSO / SCIM line beneath the CTA | |
| Proof bar under the CTAs: 4.7 (450) rating, "2M+ USERS", "GDPR & SOC2" |
Value props
82StrongTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
The AI notepad for back-to-back meetings
Notes, actions and memory. Without a meeting bot.
Working
- "Without a meeting bot" kills top objection
- "back-to-back meetings" names felt pain
- Hero shows real note beside live call
Could improve
- No numbers or proof points in fold
- Outcome implied, never stated
- No social proof above the fold
Mobile web
82StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
84StrongDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
86StrongCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Granola compares
Recommended rewrites
