Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Gradient Labs ranks
- 1.
Gradient Labs69
- 2.
Decagon67
- 3.
Dust66
- 4.
Unisson65
- 5.
Sierra62
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
42PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Gradient Labs | No visible trust signal identified. |
| "Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline | |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| Sierra Agent chat demo resolving "I don't recognize this $95 charge" and booking "Appointment booked" | |
| implicit context Decagon may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
AI-native customer operations for financial services
A suite of specialist agents for lending, disputes, and KYC with a platform that runs the operations in between.
Working
- Names exact workflows: lending, disputes, KYC
- Vertical focus is unmistakable
- Illustration labels mirror real use cases
Could improve
- No outcome or metric anywhere in fold
- Describes the product, not the payoff
- Zero emotional pull for ops buyers
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
76FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Gradient Labs compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
