Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Fixa ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
44PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Fixa | Live prompt composer with "Import from GitHub" and "Connect MCP tools" actions showing real product UI |
| Customer logo bar featuring Google, DoorDash, Navan, Abridge, Tekion, Presto, Hippocratic AI, 11x, Lendflow, Aurelian | |
| "Coval raises $28M Series A to make voice AI deployment-ready" funding banner | |
| "First test report in under 10 mins • SOC 2 Type II • HIPAA (BAA available)" strip under the CTA | |
| "New: Voice AI Orchestration Benchmarks — Retell, Vapi, Pipecat, LiveKit & more" announcement bar | |
| SOC 2 TYPE II | HIPAA BAA | BACKED BY YC badge row beneath the CTA |
Value props
52FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
What do you want to build?
Start from scratch or bring a GitHub repo. Fixa works in a cloud sandbox, runs your code, and checks its own output.
Working
- Subhead names real mechanics: sandbox, runs code
- Prompt box demonstrates product in-fold
- GitHub import signals dev-grade seriousness
Could improve
- H1 is generic; fits any AI builder
- No numbers or proof anywhere in fold
- Self-checking differentiator buried in subhead
Mobile web
76FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
78FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Fixa compares
Recommended rewrites
