Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Edison Scientific ranks
- 1.
Edison Scientific69
- 2.
FutureHouse61
- 3.
Aster53
- 4.
Sakana AI43
- 5.
Lila Sciences41
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Edison Scientific | Partner/customer logo strip on mobile showing Incyte and Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| "Andrej Karpathy's Benchmark" bar chart showing Aster at +5.68% vs Community best +2.84% and Recursive +5.57% | |
| implicit context Sakana AI may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. | |
| "We're a non-profit building AI agents to automate research in biology and other complex sciences." | |
| No visible trust signal identified. |
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
Problems
- hierarchy split with 'Book a demo'
- small footprint vs huge headline
- demo-first order feels costly
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Edison Scientific’s headline
Kosmos: The AI Scientist for R&D
Accelerating the full lifecycle of research and development, from hypothesis to approval
Working
Could improve
Mobile web
76FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
80StrongDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve