/dev/fasthttps://dev.fast/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

How /dev/fast ranks

  1. 1.Graphite78
  2. 2.Cubic75
  3. 3.CodeRabbit73
  4. 4.Greptile70
  5. 5./dev/fast65
Fix Mobile web
65Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Mobile web52Trust64
category scoresShowHide
Mobile web52Trust64

Mobile web

52Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Code demo pane — Desktop-density code snippet with horizontally clipped lines ("signRefres", "verifyRefr") is unreadable and untappable on a phone.
  2. Nav tab row — Desktop tab links "0:review* 1:about 2:blog" render as a raw text row instead of a collapsed menu.

Trust

64Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

/dev/fast
Graphite
Trust read
/dev/fastLive interactive product pane rendering PR #6594 with an "Append one session entry" sequence diagram
Graphite"Trusted by leading engineering teams at" logo strip with Vercel and Duolingo
CodeRabbitDetailed "Pull requests" product UI with P0/P1/P2 priority rows and risk/reward/effort columns
Greptile"OVER 22,000+ TEAMS USE GREPTILE" usage banner
Cubic"Martian Code Review Bench — #1 AI code reviewer" benchmark badge below the CTA

Information hierarchy

68Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

/dev/fast desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

/dev/fast

How /dev/fast compares

Recommended rewrites

Value props

74Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

/dev/fast’s headline/dev/fast/review(1) — Cursor for code review [beta]Review is an open-source desktop app designed to give you confidence in your code.

Working

Could improve