Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.
How Google DeepMind ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Information hierarchy
58FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
123- Three Learn more pills — Identical black pills repeat across cards, so no CTA reads as the primary action.
- Truncated fourth card — Card is cut mid-title at the viewport edge, signaling accidental cropping rather than intentional layout.
- Dual nav Gemini buttons — 'Build with Gemini' and 'Try Gemini' sit side by side at equal weight, splitting the top-right action.
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
DeepMind Institute
Bold thinking on AGI from the lab that pioneered the field
Working
- 'Pioneered the field' asserts authority
- AlphaGenome card names concrete outcome
- Cards show real products, not stock art
Could improve
- No unifying hero headline above carousel
- Zero numbers or proof points in the fold
- Card copy assumes prior product knowledge
Mobile web
58FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Trust
62FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

How Google DeepMind compares
Trust read
CTA
64FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Google DeepMind compares
Recommended rewrites
