Corning Life Scienceshttps://corning.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How Corning Life Sciences ranks

  1. 1.Bramante70
  2. 2.Thermo Fisher Scientific (Gibco)64
  3. 3.MilliporeSigma (Sigma-Aldrich)60
  4. 4.Corning Life Sciences55
  5. 5.Cytiva (HyClone)53
  6. 6.Lonza Bioscience52
Fix Value props
55Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props42CTA52
category scoresShowHide
Value props42CTA52

Value props

42Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Corning Life Sciences’s headline vague175 years of continuous innovationExplore Corning breakthroughs, then and now.

Working

  • Concrete number signals longevity
  • Clean, confident brand tone
  • Consistent expertise framing below fold

Could improve

  • No mention of Life Sciences products
  • Hero images decorate, not demonstrate
  • Mobile slide is PR news, text overlaps

CTA

52Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Corning Life Sciences
Bramante
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Gibco)
MilliporeSigma (Sigma-Aldrich)in-product action

Problems

  • vague label, no payoff named
  • differs on mobile ('Learn More')
  • small button vs huge hero
  • carousel rotates the primary action

Mobile web

58Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Corning Life Sciences mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Corning Life Sciences desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Corning Life Sciences desktop capture for Trust

How Corning Life Sciences compares

Trust read