Conduithttps://conduit.financial/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Conduit ranks

  1. 1.Conduit72
  2. 2.Infinite72
  3. 3.Bridge72
  4. 4.Fern61
Fix Trust
72Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust42Value props72
category scoresShowHide
Trust42Value props72

Trust

42Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Conduit
Bridge
Fern
Infinite
Trust read
Conduit"OUR CLIENTS" section label visible at the bottom of the mobile fold
InfiniteSubheadline claim "First review: 1–2 days, not 30. Accounts and every payment rail are built in."
Bridge"a stripe company" mark next to the Bridge logo, reinforced by the banner "Stablecoin-backed cards are now integrated wi
FernCustomer logo row (Slope, OTOCO, Para, Ansa Research)

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Conduit’s headline undersellsAnydollar. Anytime. Anywhere.Open USD accounts and wallets for your customers around the world, in seconds, with a single prompt.

Working

  • Subhead names deliverable: USD accounts
  • Speed claim: 'in seconds, single prompt'
  • Memorable, confident headline rhythm

Could improve

  • Headline is vague without subhead
  • Globe decorates, doesn't demonstrate
  • No proof points or numbers in fold

CTA

76Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Conduit

How Conduit compares

Recommended rewrites

Information hierarchy

84Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Conduit desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Mobile web

84Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Conduit mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve