ComfyUIhttps://comfy.org/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

How ComfyUI ranks

  1. 1.Freepik Spaces76
  2. 2.Flora74
  3. 3.Krea72
  4. 4.Weavy68
  5. 5.atlas.design66
  6. 6.ComfyUI65
Fix Mobile web
65Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Mobile web52Information hierarchy64
category scoresShowHide
Mobile web52Information hierarchy64

Mobile web

52Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Sign In pill — Only visible action is low-intent Sign In; no Try Free CTA appears anywhere in the mobile fold.
  2. Chat helper bubble — Auto-opened 'Got any questions?' bubble covers the OUTPUT demo — a dead blocker with no conversion CTA.
  3. Comfy Agent banner — Three-line promo banner consumes the top of the viewport before the brand or headline appears.

Information hierarchy

64Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Triple header CTA cluster — TRY FREE, DESKTOP, and SIGN IN sit at equal weight, splitting the primary action three ways before the banner and hero CTAs pile on.
  2. Banner TRY IT FREE — The announcement banner adds a fourth free-trial CTA above the nav, competing with TRY FREE for the same click.
  3. GET STARTED FOR FREE — Outlined low-contrast styling makes the hero CTA weaker than the header buttons it duplicates.
  4. GitHub star badge — A 143K outbound GitHub link sits beside the CTAs, leaking high-intent attention off-site.

Trust

66Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

ComfyUI desktop capture for Trust

How ComfyUI compares

Trust read

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

ComfyUI’s headlinePROFESSIONAL CONTROL OF VISUAL AI

Working

Could improve

CTA

76Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

ComfyUI

How ComfyUI compares

Recommended rewrites