Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.
How Boston Micro Fabrication (BMF) ranks
- 1.
Boston Micro Fabrication (BMF)66
- 2.
Atum Works59
- 3.
Exaddon57
- 4.
Microlight3D56
- 5.
Nanoscribe48
- 6.
UpNano37
category scores
category scoresShowHide
CTA
56FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?


Problems
- generic 'Learn More' promises nothing
- ghost outline style, low visual weight
- competes with nav 'Get Started'/'Contact'
- buried below body copy and logos
Information hierarchy
62FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Learn More button — Small ghost-outline CTA with vague label; matches the CONTACT pill's weight so no single action dominates.
- Seven-item dropdown nav — Seven top-level links plus search and language switcher offer ~10 exits before the visitor reaches any CTA.
- News section creep — The 'Introducing the new microArch S150' block enters the fold at equal headline weight, competing with the hero message.
- Duplicate language switchers — US-flag icon in the nav and a floating 'English' widget both handle locale, adding redundant chrome to the fold.
Trust
68FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

How Boston Micro Fabrication (BMF) compares
Trust read
Mobile web
68FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Value props
78FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Precision at the Microscale
Engineering the parts others can’t make.
Working
Could improve
