Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Athletica ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
68FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Athletica | "As seen in" press logo bar (Triathlete, Cycling Weekly, Outside, Trail Runner, TRI247, Strava) |
| Chat demo showing Amby's coaching message: "Morning. Sleep and HRV both look good, so today's a green light for interval | |
| Detailed real app screenshots including "TCS New York City Marathon Plan" and GPS route UI | |
| "Harness intelligence from over 100 million kilometres of real-world data" | |
| App UI screenshots showing personalized plan ("Amy, it's time to start training!") with workouts and health metrics (56 | |
| "we have published the science to back it up" claim in the hero subheadline |
Value props
76FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Train Smarter. Finish Stronger. Live Healthier.
Adaptive training plans that adjust to your fitness, fatigue, and schedule, so you improve with confidence.
Working
- Subhead names the adaptive mechanism
- Emotional pull for race-day athletes
- Hero photo matches the audience
Could improve
- No numbers or proof points in fold
- Headline alone could fit any fitness app
- Product itself not shown above fold
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
84StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
CTA
88StrongCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Athletica compares
Recommended rewrites
