Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.

How Asteroid ranks

  1. 1.Asteroid79
  2. 2.Infinitus73
  3. 3.Sohar Health72
  4. 4.Tennr63
Fix Information hierarchy
79Growth scoreupdated

category scores

category scoresShowHide

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Case study banner — High-contrast tan strip with 'READ THE CASE STUDY' pulls attention off the hero before the value prop lands.
  2. Seven-link nav row — Workflows through Docs plus Sign in gives nine exits equal footing before the primary CTA is reached.
  3. Nav Start for free — Duplicates the hero CTA at equal weight, splitting the single conversion focal point.
  4. Backed-by investor row — Grey Y Combinator/OpenAI/Hugging Face marks read as faded links, adding a fourth horizontal band competing in the fold.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Asteroid’s headline sellsIntegrate with the hardest healthcare portalsAsteroid’s HIPAA compliant platform lets you integrate with healthcare systems in minutes. EHRs, payer portals, registries and desktop apps with no APIs can now be connected to from one place.

Working

  • 'Hardest' taps real portal frustration
  • Concrete list: EHRs, payer portals, registries
  • 'No APIs' and 'in minutes' remove objections

Could improve

  • No end outcome (time saved, claims done)
  • Only number is 100+ teams, below the CTA
  • 'In minutes' is vague — quantify it

Trust

78Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Asteroid desktop capture for Trust

How Asteroid compares

Trust read

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Asteroid mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

CTA

84Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Asteroid

How Asteroid compares

Recommended rewrites