JinbaYC W26 landing page report.
← Back to YC W26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

80706050Camunda 56 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Camunda 56 on May 2 (Wayback)Camunda 72 on May 20 (Wayback)Camunda 73 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Camunda 71 on Aug 7 (Wayback)Camunda 72 on Sep 7 (Wayback)Camunda 70 on Sep 20 (Live)Unqork 58 on Apr 7 (Wayback)Unqork 55 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Unqork 57 on May 4 (Wayback)Unqork 64 on Sep 20 (Live)Appian 56 on Mar 31 (Wayback)Appian 57 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Appian 58 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Appian 58 on Jun 16 (Wayback)Appian 56 on Jul 5 (Wayback)Appian 64 on Aug 31 (Live)Pega 59 on May 2 (Wayback)Pega 65 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Pega 59 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Pega 54 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Pega 60 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Pega 57 on Sep 7 (Wayback)Pega 61 on Sep 20 (Live)Tines 67 on Jul 1 (Wayback)Tines 66 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Tines 76 on Jul 29 (Wayback)Tines 75 on Aug 14 (Wayback)Tines 76 on Aug 24 (Wayback)Tines 75 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Tines 73 on Sep 20 (Live)Jinba 67 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Jinba 72 on Sep 20 (Live)Jun 6Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202672LiveOverall +5 · Mobile web +14 · Trust +6Viewing
  2. Jun 6, 202667First tracked report — strongest CTA 82, weakest Trust 46View →

Trust

52Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Jinba
Tines
Pega
Appian
Camunda
Trust read
Jinba"Backed by Y Combinator" badge beneath the hero CTAs
Camunda"12/15 leading global banks" stat in the metrics band below the hero CTA
UnqorkNo visible trust signal identified.
Appian"Appian is a Leader in Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (BOAT)." analyst-recognition card with report
PegaForrester quadrant chart showing Pegasystems in the Leaders zone alongside Google, Microsoft, and AWS
TinesCustomer logo wall (Snowflake, Intercom, Dropbox, Pinterest, MongoDB, Sophos, Canva, McKesson, Coinbase) beneath the her

Mobile web

72Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Oversized serif headline — Scales down too little, wrapping into four huge lines that eat most of the fold and push the CTA to its edge.
  2. Half-width CTA pair — "Try it for free" shares a row with "Contact Sales" instead of being a full-bleed, thumb-friendly primary button.
  3. Six-line subheadline — Dense paragraph adds scroll depth between the headline and the tap target.

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Free Assessment nav button — Filled dark pill matches the hero CTA's weight, creating a second competing primary action in the fold.
  2. Nav link row — Five links plus a language switcher and Login give attention nine exits before the hero CTA.
  3. Product screenshot strip — The peeking app preview is cropped to abstract slivers that communicate nothing about the product at this height.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Jinba’s headline sellsThe Only AI Workflow Builder Built for Regulated Industries.Most banks are still waiting for their IT backlog to clear. Jinba lets business teams describe workflows in plain language and deploy them to production — with full compliance controls, on your infrastructure.

Working

  • Ownable 'only' claim for a clear niche
  • Subhead names the IT backlog pain
  • Mechanism is concrete: plain language to prod

Could improve

  • Zero numbers or proof points in fold
  • Hero image is blank, shows nothing
  • Desktop headline lacks emotional pull

CTA

82Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Jinba

Problems

  • four words, over 3-word ideal
  • competes with 'Free Assessment' in nav
  • 'it' is vague — doesn't name the payoff

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop