/dev/fastYC W26 landing page report.
← Back to YC W26
/dev/fasthttps://dev.fast/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

How /dev/fast ranks

  1. 1.Graphite78
  2. 2.Cubic75
  3. 3.CodeRabbit73
  4. 4.Greptile70
  5. 5./dev/fast65
Fix Mobile web
65Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Mobile web52Trust64Information hierarchy68CTA68Value props74
category scoresShowHide
Mobile web52Trust64Information hierarchy68CTA68Value props74

Score over time

9080706050Graphite 78 on Aug 27 (Live)CodeRabbit 74 on Jun 1 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 74 on Jul 13 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 76 on Jul 26 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 75 on Sep 6 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 73 on Sep 21 (Live)Greptile 70 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Greptile 66 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Greptile 69 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Greptile 69 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Greptile 68 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Greptile 75 on Sep 10 (Wayback)Greptile 70 on Sep 21 (Live)Cubic 75 on Sep 21 (Live)/dev/fast 57 on Aug 12 (Wayback)/dev/fast 65 on Sep 22 (Live)Aug 12Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202665LiveOverall +8 · Trust +18 · Information hierarchy +10Viewing
  2. Aug 12, 202657First tracked report — strongest Value props 72, weakest Trust 46View →

Mobile web

52Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Code demo pane — Desktop-density code snippet with horizontally clipped lines ("signRefres", "verifyRefr") is unreadable and untappable on a phone.
  2. Nav tab row — Desktop tab links "0:review* 1:about 2:blog" render as a raw text row instead of a collapsed menu.

Trust

64Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

/dev/fast
Graphite
Trust read
/dev/fastLive interactive product pane rendering PR #6594 with an "Append one session entry" sequence diagram
Graphite"Trusted by leading engineering teams at" logo strip with Vercel and Duolingo
CodeRabbitDetailed "Pull requests" product UI with P0/P1/P2 priority rows and risk/reward/effort columns
Greptile"OVER 22,000+ TEAMS USE GREPTILE" usage banner
Cubic"Martian Code Review Bench — #1 AI code reviewer" benchmark badge below the CTA

Information hierarchy

68Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. get in touch links — Two same-styled 'Get in touch' links flank the fold, splitting attention from 'download the app' with a second competing action.
  2. right demo pane — The SQLite PR pane occupies half the viewport at equal visual weight, so the eye lands on demo content before the headline or CTA.
  3. download the app button — Primary CTA is small, monochrome, and buried mid-column below FEATURES — it reads at the same weight as table rows above it.
  4. github repo link — SEE ALSO's outbound GitHub link creeps into the fold, adding an exit path before the visitor has acted.

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

/dev/fast
Cubic
Graphite
CodeRabbit
Greptile

Problems

  • absent from mobile fold
  • small footprint vs headline
  • no 'free' despite open-source
  • buried below feature table

Value props

74Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

/dev/fast’s headline sells/dev/fast/review(1) — Cursor for code review [beta]Review is an open-source desktop app designed to give you confidence in your code.

Working

  • "Cursor for code review" anchors category fast
  • "confidence in /dev/fast's code" names the emotion
  • Live demo pane shows the product working

Could improve

  • Headline needs Cursor familiarity to parse
  • "agent trajectories" is insider jargon
  • No numbers or proof points anywhere in fold

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Graphitegraphite.dev78 #2Cubiccubic.dev75 #3CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai73 #4Greptilegreptile.com70
#5/dev/fast65