ApproximaYC W26 landing page report.
← Back to YC W26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Approxima ranks

  1. 1.Momentic82
  2. 2.Meticulous76
  3. 3.Reflect76
  4. 4.QA Wolf73
  5. 5.Approxima66
Fix Trust

Score over time

858075706560Meticulous 77 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Meticulous 77 on Apr 30 (Wayback)Meticulous 70 on Jul 16 (Wayback)Meticulous 76 on Sep 20 (Live)QA Wolf 77 on Apr 1 (Wayback)QA Wolf 74 on Apr 10 (Wayback)QA Wolf 74 on Apr 21 (Wayback)QA Wolf 72 on May 26 (Wayback)QA Wolf 74 on Jun 28 (Wayback)QA Wolf 70 on Aug 29 (Wayback)QA Wolf 73 on Sep 20 (Live)Reflect 75 on Apr 17 (Wayback)Reflect 77 on May 20 (Wayback)Reflect 64 on Jun 8 (Wayback)Reflect 79 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Reflect 76 on Sep 21 (Live)Momentic 68 on Apr 7 (Wayback)Momentic 74 on May 14 (Wayback)Momentic 75 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Momentic 80 on Aug 10 (Wayback)Momentic 80 on Sep 16 (Wayback)Momentic 82 on Sep 20 (Live)Approxima 66 on May 18 (Wayback)Approxima 67 on May 28 (Wayback)Approxima 65 on Jun 12 (Wayback)Approxima 68 on Jul 19 (Wayback)Approxima 66 on Sep 20 (Live)May 18May 28Jun 12Jul 19Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202666LiveOverall −2 · CTA −4 · Information hierarchy +2Viewing
  2. Jul 19, 202668Overall +3 · CTA +4 · Mobile web +4View →
  3. Jun 12, 202665Overall −2 · Trust −6 · Information hierarchy +4View →
  4. May 28, 202667Overall +1 · CTA −4 · Trust +4View →
  5. May 18, 202666First tracked report — strongest Value props 78, weakest Trust 44View →

Trust

42Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Approxima
Momentic
Reflect
QA Wolf
Meticulous
Trust read
Approxima"OUR PROMISE" box: "If you run out of credits or decide Approxima is not for you, nothing changes, your tests work exact
Meticulous"Trusted by organizations including…" logo wall (Brex, Dropbox, Notion, CoreWeave, LaunchDarkly, Wealthsimple)
QA WolfCustomer logo strip: Lifesum, CoinTracker, Orangetheory Fitness, Fanatics, Figma
Reflect"TRUSTED BY" logo row: Crossbeam, MDLIVE, monday.com, Origin, Scale, The Motley Fool
Momentic"Trusted by leading engineering teams." logo wall with Retool, Notion, Webflow, Bilt, Collectors, GPTZero

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Approxima
Momentic
Reflect
QA Wolf
Meticulous

Problems

  • only in nav, none in hero body
  • generic label, no promise echo
  • no secondary CTA anywhere

Mobile web

70Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Dense thesis copy block — Four consecutive desktop-length paragraphs stack into the fold, burying the message under a wall of text.
  2. Get Started button — Header-sized CTA never repeats or goes full-width in the long scroll of copy below.

Information hierarchy

74Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Thesis text block — Four dense same-weight paragraphs stack under the headline, forcing reading instead of scanning the argument.
  2. Radar chart legend — Three near-equal legend cards make Approxima's winning position hard to spot without reading all three.
  3. Options list a/b — The two options carry the same visual weight as the thesis and promise, so no single takeaway leads the fold.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Approxima’s headline sellsEnd-to-end tests that heal themselves.

Working

  • Six-word claim names the real product
  • Speaks to flaky-test pain directly
  • Radar chart shows positioning, not decor

Could improve

  • No subhead; thesis essay delays specifics
  • Zero numbers or proof points in fold
  • 'Layer on Playwright' buried mid-page