DatoricYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

807060504030Scale AI 62 on May 30 (Wayback)Scale AI 62 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Scale AI 49 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Scale AI 64 on Aug 23 (Wayback)Scale AI 62 on Sep 5 (Wayback)Scale AI 61 on Sep 20 (Live)Surge AI 46 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Surge AI 45 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Surge AI 44 on Jul 24 (Wayback)Surge AI 46 on Aug 13 (Wayback)Surge AI 44 on Aug 21 (Wayback)Surge AI 46 on Aug 31 (Wayback)Surge AI 46 on Sep 20 (Live)Encord 71 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Encord 72 on Jun 23 (Wayback)Encord 71 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Encord 71 on Jul 18 (Wayback)Encord 70 on Jul 30 (Wayback)Encord 73 on Aug 23 (Wayback)Encord 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Protex AI 66 on Sep 20 (Live)Datoric 68 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Datoric
Encord
Trust read
Datoric"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline
Scale AIimplicit context Scale AI may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
Surge AI"New Frontier data and RL environments, off the shelf" announcement banner
EncordCustomer logo strip below the hero: Path Robotics, Woven by Toyota, Zipline, Pickle Robot, Toyota Research Institute, We
Protex AIimplicit context Protex AI may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.

Value props

62Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Datoric’s headline undersellsThe world's best models need the right data.Data for the next generation of physical AI. Licensed, ethically sourced, and built to move frontier systems from research to reality.

Working

  • Names the niche: physical AI data
  • Licensed, ethically sourced = trust
  • Research-to-reality outcome framing

Could improve

  • H1 states problem, not Datoric's offer
  • Zero numbers or proof points in fold
  • Hero visual decorates, shows no data

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Datoric
Encord
Protex AI

Problems

  • vague — unclear what click delivers
  • likely hides a sales/contact flow
  • no payoff or value word in copy

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Get data button — Desktop-proportioned pill splitting the row with 'Datasets'; should be full-width for thumb reach.
  2. Datasets secondary button — Styled nearly identically to the primary pill, competing for the tap instead of deferring to 'Get data'.
  3. ASCII flower graphic — Renders as illegible red character noise at phone size, adding clutter without communicating anything.

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Dahlia dot graphic — The hero visual collapses to a barely visible dot and line on desktop, wasting the fold's brand moment that works on mobile.
  2. Datasets secondary button — Pill-styled at near-equal size beside Get data, it splits the click at the decision point; also duplicated in the nav.
  3. Nav Get data button — A second black Get data CTA duplicates the hero button and adds a competing target in the scan path.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop