NovaflowYC S25 landing page report.
← Back to YC S25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

8070605040Watershed Bio 72 on May 4 (Wayback)Watershed Bio 71 on May 15 (Wayback)Watershed Bio 71 on Jun 11 (Wayback)Watershed Bio 71 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Watershed Bio 72 on Sep 22 (Live)Latch Bio 76 on Mar 26 (Wayback)Latch Bio 76 on Apr 17 (Wayback)Latch Bio 75 on May 28 (Wayback)Latch Bio 55 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Latch Bio 54 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Latch Bio 56 on Aug 15 (Wayback)Latch Bio 58 on Sep 22 (Live)Pluto Bio 52 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Pluto Bio 52 on May 12 (Wayback)Pluto Bio 54 on Jun 7 (Wayback)Pluto Bio 68 on Sep 22 (Live)Rosalind 58 on Jun 12 (Wayback)Rosalind 58 on Jul 3 (Wayback)Rosalind 58 on Jul 16 (Wayback)Rosalind 56 on Jul 31 (Wayback)Rosalind 61 on Aug 11 (Wayback)Rosalind 58 on Sep 12 (Wayback)Rosalind 60 on Sep 22 (Live)Novaflow 73 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 22

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Novaflow
Watershed Bio
Latch Bio
Pluto Bio
Trust read
Novaflow"BACKED BY Y Combinator, BioRender, FCVC + more" investor strip
Watershed Bio"Trusted by leading researchers" logo strip with MIT, Massachusetts General Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess, UC San Dieg
Latch Bio"113 evals · 55.5% top score" preprint stat line with named authors and Read paper link
Pluto BioPrograms dashboard screenshot showing "23 programs, 17 of which are currently active" with Kanban view and drug discover
Rosalind"Thousands of Scientists across 60+ countries trust ROSALIND with their valuable research."

CTA

70Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Novaflow
Rosalind

Problems

  • demo booking feels costly
  • no self-serve path to value
  • label varies: 'Book Demo' in nav

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Novaflow’s headline sellsAI data analyst for bio labs

Working

  • Names audience and category in 6 words
  • Stat row gives concrete proof (12+ hrs, 40%)
  • Zero buzzword filler

Could improve

  • No subhead explaining what it actually does
  • Hero image decorates, never demonstrates
  • Emotional payoff of time saved untapped

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture12
  1. Duplicate demo CTAs — "Book Demo" in the nav and "Book a Demo" in the hero are styled identically, splitting the eye between two same-weight primary buttons.
  2. Redundant "See It" button — "See It In Action" repeats in the nav and hero, doubling secondary paths and adding two more exits above the fold.

Mobile web

84Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Side-by-side CTA pair — Two half-width buttons shrink the primary Book a Demo tap target; stack them full-width.
  2. Clipped backer logo strip — The third investor badge is cut off at the viewport edge, making the trust row look broken.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop