Miso LabsYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26
Miso Labshttps://misolabs.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Miso Labs ranks

  1. 1.Deepgram75
  2. 2.Rime73
  3. 3.Cartesia69
  4. 4.Hume AI68
  5. 5.ElevenLabs67
  6. 6.Miso Labs64
Fix Trust
64Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust38Value props62CTA68Mobile web76Information hierarchy78
category scoresShowHide
Trust38Value props62CTA68Mobile web76Information hierarchy78

Score over time

9080706050ElevenLabs 66 on Mar 23 (Wayback)ElevenLabs 66 on Apr 7 (Wayback)ElevenLabs 59 on May 18 (Wayback)ElevenLabs 67 on Aug 7 (Live)ElevenLabs 65 on Aug 10 (Wayback)ElevenLabs 64 on Aug 24 (Wayback)Cartesia 64 on Jun 3 (Wayback)Cartesia 64 on Jun 12 (Wayback)Cartesia 68 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Cartesia 66 on Aug 21 (Wayback)Cartesia 66 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Cartesia 69 on Sep 20 (Live)Hume AI 71 on Feb 11 (Wayback)Hume AI 70 on Apr 7 (Wayback)Hume AI 68 on May 30 (Wayback)Hume AI 68 on Jul 28 (Live)Rime 74 on Apr 15 (Wayback)Rime 71 on May 9 (Wayback)Rime 71 on May 19 (Wayback)Rime 69 on Jun 12 (Wayback)Rime 77 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Rime 79 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Rime 73 on Sep 20 (Live)Deepgram 77 on Feb 11 (Wayback)Deepgram 77 on Feb 24 (Wayback)Deepgram 75 on Jul 28 (Live)Miso Labs 60 on Apr 14 (Wayback)Miso Labs 72 on Jun 5 (Wayback)Miso Labs 66 on Jul 20 (Wayback)Miso Labs 64 on Sep 11 (Wayback)Miso Labs 64 on Sep 20 (Live)Apr 14Jun 5Jul 20Sep 11Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202664LiveTrust +6 · Mobile web −6Viewing
  2. Sep 11, 202664Overall −2 · Trust −6 · CTA −4View →
  3. Jul 20, 202666Overall −6 · Trust −20 · Value props −6View →
  4. Jun 5, 202672Overall +12 · Mobile web +30 · Value props +14View →
  5. Apr 14, 202660First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 78, weakest Trust 48View →

Trust

38Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Deepgram
Rime
ElevenLabs
Cartesia
Hume AI
Trust read
Miso LabsNo visible trust signal identified.
ElevenLabsInteractive voice demo widget with playable "Narration" sample and ElevenCreative/ElevenAgents/ElevenAPI tabs
CartesiaInteractive "Talk to Skylar" voice demo carousel
Hume AI"Our decades of research in multimodal emotional intelligence span" with stat counters 50+ / 48+ / 600+
RimeCustomer logo strip including Mayo Clinic, LiveKit, Daily, and Dialpad below the hero CTAs
DeepgramCustomer logo strip: Daily, Cresta, Granola, VAPI, Decagon, kore.ai, NiCE, Cognigy

Value props

62Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Miso Labs’s headline sellsThe most emotive foundation models for voiceBUILD A VOICE AGENT YOUR USERS WILL LOVE.

Working

  • Names a real differentiator: emotive voice
  • Clear category — foundation models for voice
  • Subhead names the buyer's use case

Could improve

  • No audio demo to prove 'most emotive'
  • Zero numbers or proof points in the fold
  • Hero blob decorates, doesn't demonstrate

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Miso Labs
Rime
Deepgram
Cartesia

Problems

  • ambiguous — download what?
  • competes with 'API Access' CTA
  • label doesn't echo the promise
  • no zero-cost cue on the click

Mobile web

76Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Headline wraps three lines — "The most emotive foundation models for voice" scales down only slightly and eats roughly a quarter of the first viewport across three dense lines.
  2. DOWNLOAD button width — The primary CTA sits at desktop proportions, floating narrow in the phone column instead of stretching near full-bleed for the thumb.

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Hero API ACCESS button — Same size and adjacent to DOWNLOAD, splitting the primary action three ways with the nav duplicate.
  2. Nav API ACCESS button — Duplicates the hero button in solid black, pulling scan-path attention away from DOWNLOAD.
  3. Uppercase mono subhead — Low-contrast letterspaced mono type makes the supporting promise harder to read than the headline warrants.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Deepgramdeepgram.com75 #2Rimerime.ai73 #3Cartesiacartesia.ai69 #4Hume AIhume.ai68 #5ElevenLabselevenlabs.io67
#6Miso Labs64