ImperfectYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Imperfect ranks

  1. 1.Athletica79
  2. 2.Imperfect76
  3. 3.Runna75
  4. 4.Humango70
  5. 5.TrainAsONE68
Fix Trust

Score over time

9080706050Runna 66 on May 21 (Wayback)Runna 68 on May 31 (Wayback)Runna 67 on Jul 1 (Wayback)Runna 66 on Jul 18 (Wayback)Runna 65 on Aug 11 (Wayback)Runna 67 on Sep 9 (Wayback)Runna 75 on Sep 20 (Live)TrainAsONE 59 on Apr 7 (Wayback)TrainAsONE 55 on Jun 20 (Wayback)TrainAsONE 68 on Sep 22 (Live)Humango 70 on Sep 20 (Live)Athletica 78 on Apr 11 (Wayback)Athletica 77 on Apr 23 (Wayback)Athletica 65 on May 20 (Wayback)Athletica 79 on Sep 20 (Live)Imperfect 76 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Trust

52Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Imperfect
Athletica
Runna
Trust read
ImperfectDetailed app UI screenshots showing the "Set your goal" race search with the "Woodside Crossover" event and distance opt
RunnaDetailed real app screenshots including "TCS New York City Marathon Plan" and GPS route UI
TrainAsONE"Harness intelligence from over 100 million kilometres of real-world data"
HumangoApp UI screenshots showing personalized plan ("Amy, it's time to start training!") with workouts and health metrics (56
Athletica"As seen in" press logo bar (Triathlete, Cycling Weekly, Outside, Trail Runner, TRI247, Strava)

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Imperfect’s headline sellsFor athletes with real lives and epic goalsWe connect with your wearable, your health apps, and your real life to build training that makes sense today, not a plan written weeks ago.

Working

  • Subhead names real mechanism: wearable-driven plans
  • "Not a plan written weeks ago" hits the pain
  • Mockups demonstrate goal setup, not decoration

Could improve

  • H1 names the audience, not the product's job
  • Zero numbers or proof points in the fold
  • No named outcome like finishing a race

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Header Download App pill — Duplicates the hero CTA at near-equal visual weight, splitting the scan between two download buttons.
  2. Four-link nav row — Routes, Imperfect, How it works, and Blog offer four exit paths before the visitor reaches the hero CTA.
  3. Hero CTA button — Pale lilac fill on white gives it soft contrast; it reads quieter than the headline it should follow.

CTA

82Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Imperfect
Athletica
Humango

Problems

  • 4 words — one past ideal
  • nav says 'Download App', not same label
  • nav variant drops 'free'

Mobile web

86Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web mobile capture
No specific callouts

Imperfect's mobile fold is close to textbook: one headline ("For athletes with real lives and epic goals"), one supporting paragraph, and the primary CTA "Download the app, free" all visible and tappable in the first viewport with no pop-ups, cookie banners, or chat bubbles in the way. The nav collapses to a clean logo-plus-hamburger row that stays out of the hero, and the headline scales down to two comfortable lines instead of a cramped desktop wrap. The one gap is CTA sizing: "Download the app, free" is rendered as a centered pill at roughly half the column width rather than the near-full-bleed, thumb-friendly button mobile allows — stretching it edge-to-edge is the biggest lever left for this category.