AuxosYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26

Score over time

908070605040Synthetic Users 65 on Mar 6 (Wayback)Synthetic Users 74 on Mar 22 (Wayback)Synthetic Users 70 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Synthetic Users 71 on May 4 (Wayback)Synthetic Users 69 on May 17 (Wayback)Synthetic Users 75 on Jul 16 (Wayback)Synthetic Users 71 on Jul 28 (Live)Aaru 52 on May 19 (Wayback)Aaru 52 on Jun 8 (Wayback)Aaru 50 on Jul 10 (Wayback)Aaru 76 on Aug 14 (Wayback)Aaru 74 on Sep 21 (Wayback)Aaru 72 on Sep 22 (Live)Viable Fictions (Roundtable) — Artificial Societies 71 on Mar 7 (Wayback)Viable Fictions (Roundtable) — Artificial Societies 68 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Viable Fictions (Roundtable) — Artificial Societies 69 on Apr 26 (Wayback)Viable Fictions (Roundtable) — Artificial Societies 69 on May 4 (Wayback)Viable Fictions (Roundtable) — Artificial Societies 73 on Jul 28 (Live)Evidenza 81 on Jul 28 (Live)Auxos 75 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Auxos
Evidenza
Viable Fictions (Roundtable) — Artificial Societies
Trust read
Auxos"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the demo CTA
Synthetic Users"The AI feedback lined up with human feedback over 95% of the time." — Adam King, Behavioural Scientist
AaruLogo strip with EY, Bayer, IPG, Omnicom Group and claim "Six months of global wealth research in one day. 0.90 median co
Viable Fictions (Roundtable) — Artificial SocietiesLogo wall under "Informing strategies at" showing Uber, GM, Volkswagen, TRATON, Suntory, and Mondelez
Evidenza"Trusted By Hundreds Of Enterprise Brands" logo wall with Microsoft, J.P. Morgan, Nestlé, Mars, and EY

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Auxos
Aaru
Evidenza

Problems

  • demo ask feels costly, not value
  • email gate before any payoff
  • label split: Get vs Book a Demo
  • arrow icon adds no promise

Mobile web

76Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Email placeholder truncated — "What's Auxos's work emai" is cut off by the Get a Demo button overlapping the input field.
  2. Hero headline wraps — The headline scales down too little and wraps to four lines, eating roughly a third of the first viewport.
  3. Product screenshot unreadable — The desktop survey UI is shrunk into the phone column; labels like "316 responses" render at squint-size and invite dead pinch-zoom taps.

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Book a Demo header button — Second demo CTA at equal weight competes with the hero email capture for the same action.
  2. Duplicated survey question card — The Q1 gray card repeats the exact question shown in the results panel, adding processing load without new information.
  3. Three-tab product frame — 'Digital twin populations' and 'Chat with Auxos's focus group' tabs read as clickable and pull attention off the conversion path.

Value props

86Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Auxos’s headline sellsSimulate every decision before it reaches a real customer.Use digital twins of your real customers to research 100× faster and cheaper.

Working

  • Outcome-led: de-risk before customers see it
  • Concrete mechanism: digital twins
  • 100× faster/cheaper adds specificity

Could improve

  • 'Every decision' is broader than shown use
  • No audience named (PM, researcher, founder)
  • 100× claim lacks visible proof