PartclYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

8070605040ChipFlow 48 on May 11 (Wayback)ChipFlow 54 on Jul 13 (Wayback)ChipFlow 50 on Jul 23 (Wayback)ChipFlow 53 on Sep 22 (Live)Zero ASIC 59 on Apr 23 (Wayback)Zero ASIC 53 on May 18 (Wayback)Zero ASIC 58 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Zero ASIC 57 on Jul 9 (Wayback)Zero ASIC 57 on Jul 25 (Wayback)Zero ASIC 57 on Sep 22 (Live)Silimate 70 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Silimate 69 on May 8 (Wayback)Silimate 68 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Silimate 68 on Sep 20 (Live)InstaDeep (DeepPCB) / PrimisAI 50 on Sep 20 (Live)Partcl 46 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Partcl 47 on Sep 22 (Live)Jun 2Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202647LiveOverall +1 · Value props −18 · Mobile web +12Viewing
  2. Jun 2, 202646First tracked report — strongest Value props 66, weakest Trust 34View →

Trust

40Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Partcl
Zero ASIC
Silimate
Trust read
PartclTerminal demo starting with "rtl-demo $ git diff" visible at the bottom of the mobile fold
ChipFlow"Watch: ASIC Platform Configurator Demo Video" announcement bar
Zero ASIC"Sub 0.1 pj/bit chiplet communication efficiency." spec alongside the chiplet-array hardware photo
Silimate"Backed by Y Combinator" badge under the hero CTA
InstaDeep (DeepPCB) / PrimisAINo visible trust signal identified.

CTA

42Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Silimate
InstaDeep (DeepPCB) / PrimisAI
ChipFlow

Problems

  • no button or input in the fold
  • 'scroll for the demo' isn't clickable
  • nav has no action link
  • demo deferred below the fold

Value props

48Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Partcl’s headline vaguepar.tclThe feedback loop for chip design at speed of light

Working

  • Names the audience: chip design
  • Speed angle fits EDA pain
  • Demo teased right below fold

Could improve

  • H1 is just the logo, zero value
  • "Speed of light" is empty metaphor
  • No numbers, outcomes, or proof

Information hierarchy

52Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Scroll for demo cue — The only action prompt is a faint caption, not a clickable CTA — the fold has zero conversion surface.
  2. Six-link nav row — Boson, Nucleus, RTL-SO, About, Blog, Platform sit at equal weight and are the fold's only clickable paths, all leading away.
  3. Tagline text — Small monospace line carries the entire value prop with no supporting hierarchy or CTA beneath it.

Mobile web

54Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. scroll for the demo — The only action cue is a low-contrast text line and arrow at the very bottom, easy to miss and not tappable as a control.
  2. Clipped terminal block — The 'rtl-demo $ git diff' code panel is cut off at the fold edge, showing raw git output before any product explanation or CTA.