cubicYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25
cubichttps://cubic.dev/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How cubic ranks

  1. 1.Graphite78
  2. 2.cubic75
  3. 3.CodeRabbit73
  4. 4.Greptile70
  5. 5./dev/fast65
Fix Trust
75Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust62Information hierarchy72Mobile web76Value props78CTA86
category scoresShowHide
Trust62Information hierarchy72Mobile web76Value props78CTA86

Score over time

9080706050/dev/fast 57 on Aug 12 (Wayback)/dev/fast 65 on Sep 22 (Live)Graphite 78 on Aug 27 (Live)CodeRabbit 74 on Jun 1 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 74 on Jul 13 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 76 on Jul 26 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 75 on Sep 6 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 73 on Sep 21 (Live)Greptile 70 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Greptile 66 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Greptile 69 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Greptile 69 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Greptile 68 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Greptile 75 on Sep 10 (Wayback)Greptile 70 on Sep 21 (Live)cubic 75 on Sep 21 (Live)Sep 21

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

cubic
Graphite
/dev/fast
Trust read
cubic"Martian Code Review Bench — #1 AI code reviewer" benchmark badge below the CTA
/dev/fastLive interactive product pane rendering PR #6594 with an "Append one session entry" sequence diagram
Graphite"Trusted by leading engineering teams at" logo strip with Vercel and Duolingo
CodeRabbitDetailed "Pull requests" product UI with P0/P1/P2 priority rows and risk/reward/effort columns
Greptile"OVER 22,000+ TEAMS USE GREPTILE" usage banner

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Start free trial button — White-filled nav button matches the hero CTA's weight, splitting the primary action across two locations.
  2. Get a demo button — Sits at nearly the same size directly beside 'Try cubic for free', diluting the single-action scan path.
  3. Benchmark banner link — 'Read the report →' is the first clickable element on the page and pulls attention off-site before the hero.
  4. Blank white logo — The wordmark renders as an empty white square, leaving the brand anchor unidentifiable at the fold's center.

Mobile web

76Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Clipped reassurance text — Line is truncated to "click install · No credit card need" — text overflows the container on mobile.
  2. Four-line hero headline — Headline scales down too little, wrapping to four lines and pushing the CTA to the viewport edge.
  3. Ragged subhead wrapping — "cubic finds hard-to-find bugs" breaks into four uneven lines with awkward hyphen splits.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

cubic’s headline sellsAI code reviews for complex codebasescubic finds hard-to-find bugs in pull requests and your entire codebase.

Working

  • Names outcome: finds hard-to-find bugs
  • Differentiates on complex codebases
  • #1 benchmark badge backs the claim

Could improve

  • No numbers quantifying bugs or time saved
  • Hero shows a black void, not the product
  • Subhead repeats "codebase" from headline

CTA

86Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

cubic

Problems

  • 4 words, past 3-word ideal
  • nav says 'Start cubic's free trial'
  • mobile microcopy clipped at edges

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Graphitegraphite.dev78
#2cubic75
#3CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai73 #4Greptilegreptile.com70 #5/dev/fastdev.fast65