AttuneYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25
Attunehttps://attunehq.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Attune ranks

  1. 1.Graphite78
  2. 2.CodeRabbit73
  3. 3.Greptile70
  4. 4.Depot65
  5. 5.Attune46
Fix Trust
46Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust38CTA42Information hierarchy48Value props52Mobile web52
category scoresShowHide
Trust38CTA42Information hierarchy48Value props52Mobile web52

Score over time

908070605040Graphite 78 on Aug 27 (Live)CodeRabbit 74 on Jun 1 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 74 on Jul 13 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 76 on Jul 26 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 75 on Sep 6 (Wayback)CodeRabbit 73 on Sep 21 (Live)Greptile 70 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Greptile 66 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Greptile 69 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Greptile 69 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Greptile 68 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Greptile 75 on Sep 10 (Wayback)Greptile 70 on Sep 21 (Live)Depot 75 on May 14 (Wayback)Depot 74 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Depot 73 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Depot 74 on Jul 17 (Wayback)Depot 73 on Aug 18 (Wayback)Depot 66 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Depot 65 on Sep 21 (Live)Attune 46 on Sep 21 (Live)Sep 21

Trust

38Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Attune
Graphite
Greptile
CodeRabbit
Trust read
AttuneNamed project list with linked posts ("Caliper: Right-size your CI runners", "Nudge: Just-in-time guardrails for agents"
Graphite"Trusted by leading engineering teams at" logo strip with Vercel and Duolingo
CodeRabbitDetailed "Pull requests" product UI with P0/P1/P2 priority rows and risk/reward/effort columns
Greptile"OVER 22,000+ TEAMS USE GREPTILE" usage banner
DepotNo visible trust signal identified.

CTA

42Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Graphite
CodeRabbit
Depot
Greptile

Problems

  • no button or input anywhere
  • only inline text links to act on
  • no signup, waitlist, or contact path

Information hierarchy

48Poor

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Projects link list — Four identically styled links with no weighted flagship — no clear next action for a convinced visitor.
  2. Manifesto paragraph block — Four dense same-weight paragraphs between headline and projects force reading before any action is offered.
  3. Posts section links — Two more underlined exits at equal weight, diluting attention further with no hierarchy over the projects above.
  4. Inline theory link — Outbound link buried mid-paragraph pulls readers away before they reach Attune's own projects.

Value props

52Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Attune’s headline undersellsAttune Technologies, Inc.Attune is an applied AI company building the future of software engineering.

Working

  • Project bullets name concrete tools
  • Clear POV on AI-assisted engineering
  • Honest, jargon-free prose

Could improve

  • H1 is a company name, not a value prop
  • 'Future of software engineering' is generic
  • Real products buried under essay copy

Mobile web

52Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Dense manifesto paragraphs — Three long paragraphs of desktop-style essay text fill the fold with no visual hierarchy or action.
  2. Inline text links — Project links like 'nudge' and 'caliper' are small underlined words, far below thumb-friendly tap-target size.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Graphitegraphite.dev78 #2CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai73 #3Greptilegreptile.com70 #4Depotdepot.dev65
#5Attune46