SinterYC F26 landing page report.
← Back to YC F26

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How Sinter ranks

  1. 1.Protolabs74
  2. 2.Sinter71
  3. 3.Fictiv70
  4. 4.Fathom67
Fix CTA

Score over time

80757065605550Protolabs 76 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Protolabs 73 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Protolabs 74 on Jun 25 (Wayback)Protolabs 76 on Jul 13 (Wayback)Protolabs 75 on Aug 1 (Wayback)Protolabs 76 on Sep 7 (Wayback)Protolabs 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Fictiv 65 on May 6 (Wayback)Fictiv 61 on May 17 (Wayback)Fictiv 66 on May 28 (Wayback)Fictiv 69 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Fictiv 70 on Jun 25 (Wayback)Fictiv 66 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Fictiv 70 on Sep 20 (Live)Fathom 68 on Jun 7 (Wayback)Fathom 70 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Fathom 69 on Jul 1 (Wayback)Fathom 67 on Jul 19 (Wayback)Fathom 68 on Sep 9 (Wayback)Fathom 67 on Sep 23 (Live)Sinter 57 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Sinter 71 on Sep 20 (Live)Apr 13Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202671LiveOverall +14 · Trust +34 · Value props +14Viewing
  2. Apr 13, 202657First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 68, weakest Trust 34View →

CTA

64Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Sinter
Protolabs
Fictiv
Fathom

Problems

  • 'Talk' feels like a sales-call cost
  • no value payoff in the label
  • no instant-quote/in-product path

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Sinter’s headline undersellsExpedited domestic plastics manufacturing.Sinter creates a faster and radically more affordable American plastics pipeline.

Working

  • Names category and US-made angle clearly
  • Speed + cost differentiators up front
  • Engineer logo row backs the claim

Could improve

  • No numbers for speed or cost claims
  • Adjectives ("radically") do the selling
  • Hero photo is dark and shows nothing

Trust

68Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Sinter
Protolabs
Trust read
Sinter"Trusted by engineers from" logo row (Additive+, Revise Robotics, Newlab, Shinkei, abbode)
ProtolabsCustomer logo strip: Blue Origin, John Deere, Medtronic, Polaris, Sonos under "Innovative Companies We Support"
FictivNo visible trust signal identified.
FathomIndustry vertical cards ("Aerospace & Defense," "Medical," "Semiconductor," "Automotive & EV") implying regulated-indust

Mobile web

76Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Side-by-side CTA pair — Two same-weight pills split attention and stay desktop-sized instead of stacked full-width thumb targets.
  2. Trust logo grid — Newlab dwarfs the other marks and the grayed abbode wordmark reads as broken, weakening the proof row.

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Explore capabilities button — Styled at near-equal weight and larger footprint than 'Talk with us', splitting the primary action
  2. Talk with us CTA — Muted red on off-white with a small footprint; the primary action doesn't dominate the fold
  3. Headline-subtext split columns — Headline left and value prop/CTAs right break the natural top-down scan path between message and action