LunaBillYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

Fix CTA

Score over time

807570656055Adonis 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Adonis 72 on May 27 (Wayback)Adonis 74 on Jun 9 (Wayback)Adonis 73 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Adonis 73 on Jul 31 (Wayback)Adonis 72 on Aug 24 (Wayback)Adonis 73 on Sep 22 (Live)SuperDial (SuperBill) 67 on Sep 22 (Live)Infinitus 61 on Apr 3 (Wayback)Infinitus 62 on Apr 14 (Wayback)Infinitus 62 on Apr 23 (Wayback)Infinitus 65 on May 7 (Wayback)Infinitus 66 on May 15 (Wayback)Infinitus 65 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Infinitus 73 on Sep 22 (Live)Anterior 71 on Mar 31 (Wayback)Anterior 70 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Anterior 70 on May 27 (Wayback)Anterior 68 on Jun 26 (Wayback)Anterior 70 on Jul 31 (Wayback)Anterior 65 on Sep 22 (Live)LunaBill 62 on Apr 17 (Wayback)LunaBill 64 on May 20 (Wayback)LunaBill 76 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 17May 20Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202676LiveOverall +12 · Trust +26 · Information hierarchy +14Viewing
  2. May 20, 202664Overall +2 · CTA −4 · Trust +4View →
  3. Apr 17, 202662First tracked report — strongest Value props 74, weakest Trust 44View →

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

LunaBill
Infinitus
SuperDial (SuperBill)

Problems

  • sales-call click feels costly
  • no value payoff in the label
  • doesn't echo headline promise

Mobile web

72Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture1
  1. Talk to us button — Desktop-proportioned at ~40% width; on mobile it should be full-bleed and thumb-friendly.

Trust

74Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
LunaBill"Backed by Y Combinator" badge directly under the primary CTA
AdonisCustomer logo bar (ApolloMD, Commonwealth Pain & Spine, Baptist Health South Florida, Heart & Vascular Partners, CareAbo
SuperDial (SuperBill)No visible trust signal identified.
Infinitus">90% positive ratings from patients" metric strip beneath the hero CTA
Anterior"Florence: our clinical AI system for regulated and complex environments"

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Five-link nav row — Pricing, FAQ, Case study, About, Blog are five equal-weight exits competing with the conversion before the headline is read.
  2. Nav Talk to us — Duplicates the hero's primary CTA at full weight, splitting emphasis between two identical green buttons in one viewport.
  3. See how it works — Outlined at nearly the same size as the primary CTA, it siphons clicks into exploration instead of contact.
  4. Faint partner logos — Tiny, low-contrast logos under "WORKING CLAIMS FOR" are illegible at this size, wasting the fold's only social proof strip.

Value props

86Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

LunaBill’s headline sellsYour claims don't chase themselves. Luna does.LunaBill's AI agents work your entire AR queue: portals, payer calls, denials, appeals. Your team reviews outcomes, not status updates.

Working

  • Headline names the real job with wit
  • Subhead lists concrete AR tasks
  • Hero demos a claim moving to Paid

Could improve

  • No outcome metric (days, dollars)
  • Proof numbers live only in mockup
  • Logos unlabeled, weak as proof