HelonicYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

8070605040TrunkTools (Trunk Tools) 66 on Sep 20 (Live)Togal.AI 62 on Mar 26 (Wayback)Togal.AI 61 on Apr 14 (Wayback)Togal.AI 60 on Apr 23 (Wayback)Togal.AI 60 on May 7 (Wayback)Togal.AI 62 on May 19 (Wayback)Togal.AI 62 on Jun 20 (Wayback)Togal.AI 71 on Sep 20 (Live)Kreo 73 on Apr 15 (Wayback)Kreo 70 on Apr 23 (Wayback)Kreo 76 on May 16 (Wayback)Kreo 74 on Jun 7 (Wayback)Kreo 72 on Jun 20 (Wayback)Kreo 71 on Aug 29 (Wayback)Kreo 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Drawer AI 51 on Jul 17 (Wayback)Drawer AI 67 on Sep 20 (Live)Helonic 66 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Helonic 64 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 10Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202664LiveOverall −2 · Mobile web +24 · Trust −20Viewing
  2. Apr 10, 202666First tracked report — strongest CTA 78, weakest Trust 52View →

Trust

32Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Kreo
Togal.AI
TrunkTools (Trunk Tools)
Drawer AI
Trust read
HelonicNo visible trust signal identified.
TrunkTools (Trunk Tools)Embedded product UI showing a conversation: "What critical path scheduled activities happen during the week of August 17
Togal.AI"Trusted every day by thousands of professional builders." strip above the customer logo row
Kreo"Rated 4.6/5 from 80+ reviews" badge beneath the hero CTA
Drawer AI"Backed by industry Top Investors:" strip with Brick & Mortar Ventures and Base10 logos

Value props

58Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Helonic’s headline undersellsAnalyze designs automaticallyHelonic is an AI construction drawing analysis platform for architects, engineers, and general contractors who review 2D PDF plan sets.

Working

  • Subhead names exact audience and artifact
  • "2D PDF plan sets" is concretely specific
  • CTA "Start Analyzing" matches the promise

Could improve

  • Headline names activity, not outcome
  • Desktop/mobile headlines don't match
  • Skyline hero decorates, never demonstrates

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Headline over busy skyline — Thin serif headline sits directly on mid-tone city detail, cutting legibility at a glance.
  2. Book a Demo button — High-contrast nav CTA competes at equal or greater weight with the hero's 'Start Analyzing' button.
  3. White Start Analyzing button — Small pill styled identically to the 'Sign In' nav button, so the primary action doesn't visually outrank secondary controls.

CTA

78Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Helonic

Problems

  • click cost unclear — no free/trial cue
  • outcome after click is unstated

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Start Analyzing button — Desktop-proportioned pill floats narrow in the column instead of a full-bleed thumb target.
  2. Three-line hero headline — Serif headline scales down too little, wrapping into three tall lines that eat much of the fold.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop