Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Big Sur Ventures (XO Capital) ranks
- 1.
Tiny73
- 2.
Big Sur Ventures (XO Capital)70
- 3.
saas.group68
- 4.
SureSwift Capital63
- 5.
Eleos (Calm Capital-style operator)62
- 6.
Rocketable53
Trust
54FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Big Sur Ventures (XO Capital) | "WHAT WE LOOK FOR" acquisition criteria grid ($30k–$60k MRR, 80%+ gross margin, B2B SaaS, limited platform risk) |
| "Backed by Y Combinator, True Ventures, Bloomberg Beta, and INDIE.vc" | |
| Portfolio logo orbit including Dribbble, Letterboxd, AeroPress, Metalab, and Serato | |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| Mobile photo grid of real saas.group team members at events and in-office (branded shirts, conference talks) | |
| "COMPANIES" portfolio listing "Judicial Systems" with the outbound link "JUDICIALSYSTEMS.COM ↗" |
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
Problems
- not visible on mobile fold
- nav-sized, no hero repeat
- click feels high-commitment
Mobile web
64FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
84StrongDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
Value props
86StrongTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Big Sur Ventures (XO Capital)’s headline
We buy & operate SaaS companies.
We're founders. We buy profitable B2B SaaS from the people who built it, close in about 30 days, and keep the thing running.
Working
Could improve