Subconscious.ai Growth Score: 77/100

Lazyweb

Subconscious.aihttps://subconscious.ai/

Complete both scorecards to calculate your growth score.

—Overall growth scoreupdated Jul 28, 2026

Funnel

Acquire

Activate

Coming soon

Monetize

Coming soon

Retain / Reengage

Coming soon

Graded against Lazyweb’s growth rubrics.

Subconscious.aihttps://subconscious.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How Subconscious.ai ranks

Fix CTA

77Growth scoreupdated Jul 28, 2026

category scores

CTA68 Trust72 Value props80 Information hierarchy82 Mobile web82

category scoresShowHide

CTA68 Trust72 Value props80 Information hierarchy82 Mobile web82

Score over time

Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports

Jul 28, 202677LiveOverall +21 · Trust +42 · Value props +32Viewing
Mar 11, 202656Overall −3 · Mobile web −8 · Value props −6View →
Feb 7, 202659First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 74, weakest Trust 32View →

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Problems

'demo' implies a sales-call cost
no product-value or speed framing
mobile outline button is low-contrast

Trust

72Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

	Trust read
Subconscious.ai	"// Trusted by PwC Deloitte Finta Fortune 100 Aerospace Coinbase" strip
Similate.ai	Backed by a16z / speedrun badge
Artificial Societies	Logo wall under "Informing strategies at" showing Uber, GM, Volkswagen, TRATON, Suntory, and Mondelez
Synthetic Users	"The AI feedback lined up with human feedback over 95% of the time." — Adam King, Behavioural Scientist
Evidenza	"Trusted By Hundreds Of Enterprise Brands" logo wall with Microsoft, J.P. Morgan, Nestlé, Mars, and EY

Value props

80Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Subconscious.ai’s headline sellsCausal AI for human decisions.Most AI predicts what people say. Subconscious runs randomized experiments on a simulation of your market. 93% replication accuracy against real human behavior. Know which action drives the outcome. Minutes, not months.

Working

93% accuracy stat with cited source
'Minutes, not months' speed contrast
Sharp contrast vs. predictive AI

Could improve

H1 is jargon; needs an outcome
Hero render shows nothing about product
Headline unreadable without AI context

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture

3D spike render — Occupies half the fold but is too abstract and washed-out to communicate the simulation promise.
Four stat blocks — "8h", "24/7", "SOC 2", and "93%" share identical weight, so no proof point wins the glance.
(source) links — Two underlined exit links sit at the fold's base, leaking attention away from the demo CTA.

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture

Get a demo button — Half-width outlined ghost button — the desktop's filled navy CTA lost all visual weight on mobile.
Stat column captions — Four columns crammed side-by-side; the 24/7 and SOC 2 captions collide ("experiments and" touches "enterprise").
Trusted by row — Logo list wraps into a ragged second line with uneven spacing, weakening the social-proof strip.