Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.
How R.test (Riiid) ranks
- 1.
Miyagi Labs81
- 2.
LearnQ.ai62
- 3.
R.test (Riiid)50
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Value props
42PoorTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
ACT® Updates Step-by-step Visual Explanations Upgrade for All Sets!
Working
- Screenshot hero shows real explanations
- Test cards clarify SAT/ACT/PSAT scope
- Mobile slide names an outcome (success)
Could improve
- H1 is a changelog note, not a value prop
- No subhead or proof numbers anywhere
- Carousel shows different message per device
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| R.test (Riiid) | No visible trust signal identified. |
| "Trusted by 100K+ students across the US, India, Kenya, Nigeria & Türkiye" | |
| HolonIQ North America EdTech 200 award badges (2023 & 2024) |
CTA
52FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How R.test (Riiid) compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
54FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
54FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
