Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.
How LearnQ.ai ranks
- 1.
Miyagi Labs81
- 2.
LearnQ.ai62
- 3.
R.test (Riiid)50
62Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Value props
48PoorTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
LearnQ.ai’s headline vague
Learn Smarter, with Personalization
Understand your learning journey
Working
- Hero graphic shows 1550 SAT score outcome
- CTA anchors price at $17/month
- Award badges add credibility
Could improve
- Headline never mentions SAT
- Subhead adds zero specifics
- No score-improvement claim in copy
Trust
56FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| LearnQ.ai | HolonIQ North America EdTech 200 award badges (2023 & 2024) |
| "Trusted by 100K+ students across the US, India, Kenya, Nigeria & Türkiye" | |
| No visible trust signal identified. |
CTA
60FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How LearnQ.ai compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
68FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
Mobile web
80StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve