Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How RobCo ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| RobCo | "Marktpioniere setzen auf RobCo" logo strip (Rosenberger, MCW Systemtechnik) on mobile |
| Banner: "Announcing our $10mn Seed round with TechCrunch" | |
| ZiGGY robot product shots showing on-device UI ("Charging Time 2 hours" map screen and "Scan for directions") | |
| implicit context Stäubli (robotic quick-connect EV charging) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
Value props
54FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Autonomous Industrial Robotics
Automate the ordinary, so humans can do the extraordinary
Working
- Hero image shows real robot arm at work
- Subhead has emotional human-vs-drudgery angle
- Mobile logo strip adds customer proof
Could improve
- Headline is a category label, not a value claim
- Zero numbers or concrete outcomes in the fold
- English hero copy clashes with German nav/CTAs
CTA
70FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How RobCo compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
76FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
