Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.
How EV Safe Charge (ZiGGY) ranks
- 1.
RobCo65
- 2.
Aseon Labs53
- 3.
EV Safe Charge (ZiGGY)52
- 4.
Stäubli (robotic quick-connect EV charging)49
CTA
48PoorCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?



Problems
- no CTA in hero on either viewport
- no CTA visible in mobile fold
- generic label, no value promise
- small footprint vs orange headline
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.



| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| EV Safe Charge (ZiGGY) | ZiGGY robot product shots showing on-device UI ("Charging Time 2 hours" map screen and "Scan for directions") |
| Banner: "Announcing our $10mn Seed round with TechCrunch" | |
| "Marktpioniere setzen auf RobCo" logo strip (Rosenberger, MCW Systemtechnik) on mobile | |
| implicit context Stäubli (robotic quick-connect EV charging) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
Information hierarchy
52FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
54FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Charge And Go
Professional EV Charger Rentals, Consultation, Sales & Installation
Working
Could improve
