Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Ranger ranks
72Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
62FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Ranger | "Test Runs" dashboard screenshot showing real run numbers, agent findings, and linked PRs (#1611, #1431) |
| Customer logo wall (Polymarket, Phantom, Ziina, Mercor, Gobi) labeled "Trusted by leading engineering teams" | |
| Customer logo strip: Lifesum, CoinTracker, Orangetheory Fitness, Fanatics, Figma | |
| "Trusted by leading engineering teams." logo wall with Retool, Notion, Webflow, Bilt, Collectors, GPTZero | |
| Announcement bar: "Duolingo publishes case study on reducing manual regression tests by 70% using MobileBoost." | |
| "Trusted by organizations including…" logo wall (Brex, Dropbox, Notion, CoreWeave, LaunchDarkly, Wealthsimple) |
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Ranger’s headline sells
Verify work as fast as your agents can write it.
Ranger is the always-on AI QA platform where teams turn big ideas into real products.
Working
- Headline nails the agent-speed QA pain
- Dashboard hero shows real test runs on PRs
- curl install signals dev-native ease
Could improve
- Subhead ends in generic abstraction
- No numbers or proof points in fold
- Outcome of a 'run' left unexplained
Mobile web
72FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
CTA
76FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How Ranger compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve