Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Rainforest QA ranks
Trust
58FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Rainforest QA | Detailed real product screenshots: "AI-suggested test plan" and "Generate test with AI" panels under "MAP POTENTIAL COVE |
| "BACKED BY Y-COMBINATOR" badge above the hero headline | |
| Customer logo strip: Lifesum, CoinTracker, Orangetheory Fitness, Fanatics, Figma | |
| Announcement bar: "Duolingo publishes case study on reducing manual regression tests by 70% using MobileBoost." | |
| "Trusted by leading engineering teams." logo wall with Retool, Notion, Webflow, Bilt, Collectors, GPTZero | |
| Embedded "Aximo — AI Testing Agent" product window showing real UI with sidebar and "6,317 credits used 5,758 remaining" |
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
Problems
- demo booking feels costly
- work email required upfront
- no self-serve alternative visible
Value props
76FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Rainforest QA’s headline
The no-code QA platform powered by AI
For teams fed up with manual, ad-hoc testing, Rainforest uses AI to create, maintain, and manage tests better — without sacrificing predictability.
Working
Could improve
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve