Questiehttps://www.questie.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.

How Questie ranks

  1. 1.Character.AI68
  2. 2.Kindroid68
  3. 3.Questie64
  4. 4.SpicyChat61
  5. 5.Shapes58
  6. 6.Talkie AI52
Fix Information hierarchy
64Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Information hierarchy54Value props56
category scoresShowHide
Information hierarchy54Value props56

Information hierarchy

54Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Sidebar navigation — Fourteen equal-weight links (Dashboard through Plans) leak attention before the visitor ever meets the primary CTA.
  2. Header tagline — The entire value proposition is small grey header text next to the logo — no headline commands the fold.
  3. Discord button — Saturated purple styling outweighs the adjacent "Get Started" CTA, splitting the header's one action into two.
  4. Demo screenshot panel — A screenshot-within-a-screenshot with overlapping gameplay insets is illegible at this scale and adds clutter instead of proof.

Value props

56Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Questie’s headline undersellsQuestie.ai – create your own AI gaming companionJoin 25,000+ players using immersive AI companions!

Working

  • 25,000+ players gives concrete proof
  • Screenshot shows chat reacting to gameplay
  • Mobile caption names real-time reaction

Could improve

  • Headline is a nav byline, not a pitch
  • Screen-reaction value missing on desktop
  • No subhead states an outcome or benefit

CTA

63Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Questie

How Questie compares

Recommended rewrites

Trust

68Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Questie desktop capture for Trust

How Questie compares

Trust read

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Questie mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve