Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Pieces ranks
- 1.
Mem078
- 2.
Zep78
- 3.
Skillsync69
- 4.
Pieces67
- 5.
Letta52
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Pieces | Detailed product screenshot showing the Pieces app with a dated activity timeline and summary cards ("Standup Update", " |
| "WORKS WITH" integration logo row (Anthropic, OpenAI, and other agent tools) | |
| Research listing "Memory Models: Towards Agents That Learn — JUN 2026" | |
| GitHub star badge showing "61,868" stars in the nav | |
| "TRUSTED BY AI TEAMS" logo wall with Samsung, Zscaler, HoneYBOOK, Quorum, and AGI, Inc. |
CTA
58FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?




Problems
- 'MCP' is unexplained jargon
- 'Explore' promises browsing, not value
- both CTAs use the same weak verb
- no path to actually get the product
Value props
76FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Your entire work history, on demand.
Pieces runs in the background on your computer, forming a searchable memory that turns what already happened into what you need to understand, do, or create next.
Working
Could improve
Mobile web
76FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
