Picahttps://picaos.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

How Pica ranks

  1. 1.Composio78
  2. 2.Arcade75
  3. 3.Toolhouse70
  4. 4.Pica68
  5. 5.Orthogonal68
Fix Mobile web
68Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Mobile web58Trust64
category scoresShowHide
Mobile web58Trust64

Mobile web

58Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Truncated announcement bar — The '$4M' banner text clips mid-sentence with an ellipsis and its 'Read the announcement' link is cut off entirely.
  2. npm install snippet — A terminal command is the only action element on the fold — non-developers and mobile users cannot act on 'npm i -g @withone/cli' from a phone.

Trust

64Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Pica
Composio
Trust read
Pica"USED BY TEAMS AT" logo strip showing Cisco, Dropbox, Lyft, Figma, and Docker
Orthogonal"We raised $4.3M led by Pantera Capital" / "Backed by Y Combinator" banner
ComposioCustomer logo strip: HubSpot, wabi, agent.ai, Zoom
ToolhouseProduct demo UI showing an AI worker returning a redlined "Master Services Agreement" with tracked changes, captioned "R
Arcade"ARCADE IS TRUSTED FOR PRODUCTION AGENTS AT" logo strip with Relevance AI, YUR, Sybill, eddo learning

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Pica

How Pica compares

Recommended rewrites

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Pica desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Pica’s headlineThe trust layer for AI agents.Give your agents access to 845+ platforms, wrapped in the auth, access control, and audit that make them safe and reliable to run in production.

Working

Could improve