OpenGrokhttps://oracle.github.io/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How OpenGrok ranks

  1. 1.Sourcebot72
  2. 2.Zoekt69
  3. 3.Sourcegraph65
  4. 4.OpenGrok62
Fix Value props
62Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props55Mobile web58
category scoresShowHide
Value props55Mobile web58

Value props

55Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

OpenGrok’s headline vagueOpen Source Projects at OracleOracle contributes as a leader and as a worker bee to open source communities. Oracle is a supporting member of the Linux Foundation, Cloud Native Computing Foundation, Eclipse Foundation, and the Java Community Process. And Oracle employee

Working

  • Names real foundations as proof
  • Repo cards show live star counts
  • Search box makes the use case clear

Could improve

  • No visitor outcome in the headline
  • Subhead is Oracle-centric, not user-centric
  • No numbers or scale above the cards

Mobile web

58Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Nine-line intro paragraph — Full desktop paragraph wraps into nine mobile lines, pushing the search box and repo list below the fold.
  2. Oversized page headline — Headline barely scales down for phones, wrapping across two huge lines and eating fold space.
  3. Unlabeled sort icons — Four icon-only sort buttons give no text hint of what tapping them changes.

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

OpenGrok desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

OpenGrokin-product action

How OpenGrok compares

Recommended rewrites

Trust

68Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

OpenGrok desktop capture for Trust

How OpenGrok compares

Trust read