OpenSpechttp://openspec.dev/

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How OpenSpec ranks

  1. 1.GitHub Spec Kit69
  2. 2.Kiro69
  3. 3.OpenSpec66
  4. 4.Tessl65
Fix CTA
66Growth scoreupdated

category scores

CTA48Mobile web62
category scoresShowHide
CTA48Mobile web62

CTA

48Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

OpenSpecin-product action
Tessl
GitHub Spec Kit
Kiro

Problems

  • at bottom edge of desktop fold
  • absent from mobile fold entirely
  • styled as docs, not an action
  • no action verb or payoff copy

Mobile web

62Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. SYNOPSIS body paragraphs — Monospace body text barely scales down, wrapping into nine dense lines that push the install CTA far below the fold.
  2. Decorative wave graphic — Large ornamental band consumes prime viewport space while the primary install action sits off-screen.

Information hierarchy

68Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

OpenSpec desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Trust

72Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

OpenSpec desktop capture for Trust

How OpenSpec compares

Trust read

Value props

82Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

OpenSpec’s headlineThe spec framework for building the right thing and building it rightOpenSpec is a lightweight and configurable framework for creating and managing software specifications.

Working

Could improve