Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Ohana ranks
65Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
44PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Ohana | Live chat interface with "What's on your mind?" input, prompt chips (Doctor Visit, Home Safety, Burnout), and GPT-6 Astr |
| "We'll email you when it's ready. No spam." reassurance under the waitlist form | |
| Product Hunt "#1 Product of the Day" badge above the headline | |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| Five-star testimonial card: "The best app on my phone!" — Olivia Munn, Actress | |
| G2 badge with 4.9 star rating below the "Try for free" CTA |
Value props
52FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Ohana’s headline undersells
Hi, I'm Ohana! 👋
Your AI caregiving companion
Working
- Warm, human greeting fits caregiving
- Topic chips hint at real use cases
- Clear it's an AI chat product
Could improve
- Headline states no benefit or outcome
- Subhead is a category label, not value
- No numbers or proof anywhere in fold
Information hierarchy
74FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
CTA
78FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How Ohana compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve