Logseqhttps://logseq.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

How Logseq ranks

  1. 1.Obsidian75
  2. 2.Joplin72
  3. 3.Epicenter62
  4. 4.AnyType62
  5. 5.Logseq55
Fix Mobile web
55Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Mobile web32Trust48
category scoresShowHide
Mobile web32Trust48

Mobile web

32Poor

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Headline overlapped by card — The "Meeting with Jessica" card sits on top of "understanding", making the headline's second half unreadable.
  2. Broken icon glyphs — Card metadata shows empty tofu boxes (□) instead of icons next to Person, Book, and Peter Morville.
  3. Hamburger plus link row — Header keeps Home and Downloads links AND a hamburger, a redundant half-collapsed nav pattern.

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Logseq
Joplin
Obsidian
Trust read
LogseqProduct demo mockup showing linked notes: "Meeting with [[Jessica]]" referencing "Book/Intertwingled"
Epicenter"100% open source" / "Plain text & SQLite" checkmark claims near the CTAs
ObsidianReal product screenshot showing the "Writing is telepathy" note with file tree, tags, and graph view
AnyTypeNav banner: "Run your company on Anytype · Encrypted, Swiss-based, yours"
JoplinDetailed real product screenshot showing the Joplin desktop app (notebooks, tags, markdown note 'Vintage Piano Store ide

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Logseq desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

66Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Logseq

How Logseq compares

Recommended rewrites

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Logseq’s headlineConnect your notes, increase understanding.

Working

Could improve