GMXhttps://gmx.io/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How GMX ranks

  1. 1.GMX79
  2. 2.Ostium78
  3. 3.Gains Network (gTrade)77
  4. 4.QFEX57
Fix Trust
79Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust70Value props76
category scoresShowHide
Trust70Value props76

Trust

70Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
GMXStats row: "Traders 747K · Open interest $71M · Total volume $380B"
QFEXNo visible trust signal identified.
OstiumInvestor logo strip (Coinbase Ventures, General Catalyst, GSR, Jump, LocalGlobe, Wintermute) with a real trading UI scre
Gains Network (gTrade)Stats bar: "Total Volume $110B+ · Total Trades 3M+ · Total Users 38k+ · Pairs 290+"

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

GMX’s headline sellsTrade multiple asset classes from your walletDecentralised permissionless on-chain exchange with deep liquidity and low costs, live since 2021

Working

  • "from GMX's wallet" nails self-custody value
  • 747K / $71M / $380B stats back the claims
  • "live since 2021" signals survivor credibility

Could improve

  • No emotional hook: safety, speed, or control
  • Hero gradient decorates, never demonstrates
  • "low costs" vague — no fee number

CTA

78Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

GMX

How GMX compares

Recommended rewrites

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

GMX desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Mobile web

88Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

GMX mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve