Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How General Astronautics ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
42PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| General Astronautics | Cited claim "Astronaut time is valued at $130,000 an hour [1]" with footnote references |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| MOTIV SPACE SYSTEMS HAS JOINED THE ROCKET LAB FAMILY AS ROCKET LAB ROBOTICS | |
| Mobile announcement: "Varda announces a research collaboration with United Therapeutics." | |
| Redwire Receives $21.5 Million Follow-On Order from Portfolio Acquisition Executive Robotic Autonomous Systems (PAE RAS) |
Information hierarchy
56FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Join us / Inquire pair — Two same-size header buttons split the primary action; only tan fill differentiates them, and neither is echoed near the content.
- Essay body text — Five dense serif paragraphs above the fold read as a text wall with no bolded takeaways or visual beats.
- Footnote links 1, 2 — Gold inline citation links pull the eye mid-sentence and offer exits before the visitor reaches any CTA.
- Contents sidebar — Six equal-weight anchor links compete with the thesis headline and add navigation choices before the argument lands.
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Our Thesis for Humanity
A Vast and Endless Sea
Working
Could improve
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How General Astronautics compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
74FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
