Dockhttps://dock.us/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Dock ranks

  1. 1.Dock75
  2. 2.OnRamp70
  3. 3.Rovr66
  4. 4.GUIDEcx64
  5. 5.Rocketlane59
Fix Trust
75Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust68Information hierarchy72
category scoresShowHide
Trust68Information hierarchy72

Trust

68Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
DockCustomer logo strip labeled "Revenue teams love Dock" featuring Cursor, Numeric, Zip, Transfr, and Postscript
Rovr"BACKED BY" Y Combinator badge
RocketlaneNo visible trust signal identified.
GUIDEcxNo visible trust signal identified.
OnRampCustomer logo strip (CVS Health, Bullhorn, Qualia, Simpplr) labeled "Trusted by Customer and Operation Leaders at top B2

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Header CTA pair — "Request Demo" and "Start for Free" sit at equal weight beside the hero's "Create" button, splitting the primary action three ways.
  2. Create prompt box — The interactive prompt with three tabs asks visitors to compose input before converting — higher friction than a one-click CTA and it competes with "Start for Free".
  3. Customer logo strip — Logos like Cursor and Zip are overlaid on a busy photo edge, and "Postscript" nearly disappears against the light shirt.

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Dock’s headlineRevenue enablement sellers actually useAsk Dock to create sales rooms, onboarding portals, playbooks, and more.

Working

Could improve

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Dock mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

CTA

84Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Dockin-product action

How Dock compares

Recommended rewrites