Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.
How Cyberhaven ranks
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?





Problems
- click feels costly — sales gate
- no CTA in the hero itself
- 'Request' implies waiting, not value
- desktop button lost in nav corner
Trust
64FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Cyberhaven | Data-lineage demo diagram tracing customers_q2.csv across Claude, Salesforce, Google Drive and Gemini |
| "Backed by" Y Combinator badge above the headline | |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| 2025 Gartner Email Security MQ Leader headline with the Magic Quadrant chart showing Mimecast in the Leaders quadrant | |
| Authentic conference photos of a keynote speaker and badged attendees at Proofpoint Protect | |
| Detailed product dashboard screenshot showing "Risky Users" panel with risk scores and "Time Worked 1,039h" metrics |
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
AI Changed Work. We Protect It.
Cyberhaven traces the full lifecycle of your data, adapting protection to changing context.
Working
Could improve
Mobile web
72FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
