Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Corlytics ranks
61Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Corlytics | No visible trust signal identified. |
| "Featured partners" logo row: Nubank, Wise, OKX, Binance, capital.com, GTN, bleap, Paddle | |
| "Trusted by institutions managing over" line at the bottom of the desktop fold | |
| "10 million data points processed annually / 250 in-house regulatory experts / 750 jurisdictions monitored" stat row | |
| Embedded product UI screenshot showing the "Regulatory Research Agent" dashboard | |
| Stat bar: "21M+ regulatory documents", "8,000+ sources across 3,000+ agencies", "230+ jurisdictions", "100+ languages" |
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Corlytics’s headline vague
Corlytics: Regulation Actioned
Corlytics’ AI-powered regulatory intelligence platform streamlines compliance, enhances regulatory insight and enables firms to manage non-financial risk at scale.
Working
- Subhead names category and audience
- "Regulation Actioned" hints at outcomes
- Non-financial risk angle is distinctive
Could improve
- H1 is a tagline, not a value prop
- No numbers or proof points in fold
- Hero photo decorates, shows no product
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How Corlytics compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
64FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
Mobile web
72FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve